A prospective assessment of renal impairment after preparation for colonoscopy: oral sodium phosphate appears to be safe in well-hydrated subjects with normal renal status.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of colonoscopy is highly dependent upon the quality of bowel cleansing prior to the procedure. Oral sodium phosphate solutions (OSPS) or preparations containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) are generally employed. However, the safety of administering OSPS prior to colonoscopy has been questioned because of the potential for renal failure. AIM: To compare rates of renal failure after OSPS and PEG in a randomized, prospective trial and to assess the quality of colonoscopy after these two bowel preparations. METHODS: Subjects with eGFR >or= 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and expressed willingness to adhere to hydration recommendations were randomized to OSPS or PEG solutions. Renal function was assessed 1 week prior to, immediately prior to, and 1 week after colonoscopy. RESULTS: No subject had acute kidney failure after OSPS or PEG. OSPS was associated with significant increases in the serum phosphate and sodium levels and significant decreases in the calcium and potassium levels. These values returned to normal limits in all subjects by 1 week after colonoscopy. The quality of colonic cleansing was superior after OSPS than after PEG (Ottawa score 2.5 +/- 2.2 vs. 3.5 +/- 2.3, respectively, P < 0.05). The detection of one or more adenomatous polyps was higher after OSPS than after PEG. CONCLUSIONS: Renal failure was not detected after the use of OSPS for colonoscopy preparation in subjects with recently documented normal renal function who were able to consume the required amounts of water after each dose. However, based on the number of subjects studied, the theoretical risk of this complication is still between 0 and 6.3%. Thus, it is appreciated that only a very large prospective trial would have yielded a more accurate estimate of the likelihood of renal compromise after OSPS. Despite this caveat, OSPS has advantages over PEG in terms of the adequacy of colonic visualization and the number of polyps detected.

Clinical trial: the efficacy and safety of routine bowel cleansing agents for elective colonoscopy in persons with spinal cord injury - a randomized prospective single-blind study.

BACKGROUND: As difficulty with evacuation is a common occurrence in individuals with spinal cord injury, preparation prior to colonoscopy may be suboptimal and, perhaps, more hazardous. AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of bowel cleansing regimens in persons with spinal cord injury. METHODS: Randomized, prospective, single blind study comparing polyethylene glycol (PEG), oral sodium phosphosoda (OSPS) and combination of both for colonic preparation prior to colonoscopy in subjects with spinal cord injury. RESULTS: Thirty six subjects with eGFR > or =60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) were randomized to PEG or OSPS or PEG+OSPS. Regardless of bowel preparation employed, >73% of subjects had unacceptable colonic cleansing. No subject in the OSPS preparation group demonstrated a decrease in eGFR or an increase in serum creatinine concentration from the baseline. OSPS and PEG+OSPS preparations caused a transient change in serum potassium, phosphate and calcium concentrations, but no change in electrolytes was noted in the PEG group. CONCLUSIONS: Neither OSPS alone, PEG alone nor their combination was sufficient to prepare adequately the bowel for colonoscopy in most patients with spinal cord injury. However, administration of OSPS and/or PEG appears to be safe in the spinal cord injury population, provided adequate hydration is provided.

Effect of acute gastric electrical stimulation on the systemic release of hormones and plasma glucose in dogs.

This study evaluated the effect of gastric electrical stimulation (GES) with various parameters on plasma concentrations of satiety-related peptides and glucose. GES was performed in nine healthy dogs via electrodes implanted in the middle of the lesser curvature. Four sessions were performed in each animal: control, stimulation with IGS (implantable gastric stimulation for obesity, 0.3 m sec), modified IGS (2 msec), and long pulses (300 msec). Blood samples were collected at 15 and 0 min before the meal and at 15, 30, and 60 min after the meal. GES was initiated 30 min before the first blood sample and maintained throughout collection. Plasma ghrelin, leptin, insulin and glucose were measured. The total AUCs of plasma ghrelin and leptin were not significantly affected by GES. The total AUC of plasma insulin was significantly lower with IGS and long pulse parameters (P < 0.05). The total AUC for plasma glucose was significantly lower in sessions with long pulses and modified IGS parameters (P < 0.05). We conclude that acute GES is able to change the release of some satiety-related peptides. Whether this is associated with the changed eating behavior and weight loss in obese patients needs further investigation.